Science Fiction - Analysis
Faster than light, stuck behind glass
Les Murray’s central claim is that the mind’s ability to move instantly—the speed of thought
—creates a new kind of isolation: we arrive everywhere, yet we can’t truly arrive. The poem starts like a boast—I can travel
, so can you
—but it quickly turns into an account of what that travel costs. The speaker isn’t marveling at science; he’s naming a condition where consciousness outruns the body, and presence becomes unreachable.
The destination where no one sees you
The key image is the thought balloons
that show up at destinations
but are coated invisible
. That coating does two things at once: it makes the traveler safe, and it makes the traveler unreal. The phrase no one there sees us
is blunt, almost childlike, but it hits a precise fear—imagination can visit any place or person, yet that visit might be only a private cartoon hovering over reality. The worst part isn’t just invisibility; it’s imprisonment: we can’t get out
to be real or present
. Thought can cross space, but it can’t cross the membrane into shared life.
Phones that erase the journey
The poem’s hinge comes when the speaker moves from mental travel to everyday technology: phone and videophone
are almost worse
. They promise contact, but Murray frames them as anti-travel: we don’t see a journey
, we stay in our space
. What should be connection becomes a sealed-room performance—just talking and joking
—with an ache underneath it. The word reach
admits distance even as it claims success; you can reach someone and still be unable to touch
them.
Safety as a kind of harm
One of the poem’s sharpest contradictions is that the very thing that protects us also empties our lives. The speaker describes the nothing that can hurt us
as if it were a padded cell: no wounds, no risk, and therefore no real contact. The poem refuses to romanticize pain, but it suggests that a world with nothing that can hurt you may also be a world where nothing can hold you. That’s why the closing verdict has to be double-edged: how lovely and terrible
. The loveliness is speed, access, safety; the terribleness is the price those comforts extract.
A question the poem won’t let go of
If we can be everywhere instantly, why does the poem keep returning to being unseen—no one there sees us
? The image implies that the deeper problem isn’t technology but a habit of living as a projection, preferring the controllable space
we stay in to the unpredictable world where touch, misunderstanding, and consequence happen.
The final word: lonely
The last word, lonely
, lands like a diagnosis. After all the talk of speed and devices, Murray ends on the oldest human feeling, suggesting that futuristic communication may intensify a familiar ache rather than solve it. The poem’s tone shifts from playful wonder to austere clarity: we have learned to travel without moving, to speak without meeting, to be protected by invisibility—and that is precisely why we feel both marvel and mourning at the same time.
Feel free to be first to leave comment.