Peekabo I Almost See You - Analysis
Aging as a comedy of misrecognition
Ogden Nash’s central joke is that middle age doesn’t announce itself with tragedy, but with a series of tiny humiliations that scramble the simplest acts of recognition. The speaker begins by insisting Middle-aged life is merry
, as if cheerfulness can settle the matter. But the poem’s real subject is how the body quietly changes the rules: your eyes are all right
, yet your arm isn’t long enough
to hold the telephone book at the right distance. It’s not blindness exactly; it’s a new geometry of living, where ordinary objects become problems and the self’s competence starts to wobble.
The oculist as the poem’s trickster
When the speaker goes to the oculist, Nash doubles the comedy by making the doctor a professional tease: among jocular friends, the oculist becomes the joculist
. The poem lingers on his mockery not because the speaker is offended, but because the teasing mirrors the speaker’s new condition: being slightly out of step with what’s in front of him. The funniest example is also the most telling—he once greeted the grandfather clock, saying Good evening
to it under the impression
it was the doctor. That mistake isn’t just slapstick; it’s an emblem of middle age as a social blur, where you can misplace a person into an object and only later realize you’ve slipped.
When letters stop being language
The eye chart turns sight into absurdity: it reads SHRDLU QWERTYOP
, a string that looks like language but isn’t. The speaker’s instinctive response—why SHRDNTLU
—is a brilliant little dodge: he treats nonsense as if it’s a matter of spelling, as if the problem is the chart’s wording rather than his own eyes. Nash makes the tension clear: the speaker wants to stay in a world where everything is legible and correctable, yet the whole appointment exists because legibility is failing. Even the solution is a new kind of division. The doctor says one set of glasses won’t do
; you need two
. The body’s slight decline demands a more complicated self, split into different modes of seeing.
Two pairs of glasses, two versions of the self
The poem’s best gag is also its sharpest point: one pair is for reading both Perry Mason
and Keats’s Endymion
. By placing a popular courtroom mystery beside a canonical Romantic poem, Nash suggests the speaker’s life is pleasantly mixed—high and low, serious and silly—and all of it now depends on equipment. The other pair is for walking around without saying Hello
to strange wymion
, a deliberately warped echo of Endymion
that turns literary refinement into social embarrassment. The contradiction is painful beneath the humor: the same person who wants to read well also wants to recognize people correctly, and yet the tools required for each purpose interfere with the other.
The hinge: from irritation to chosen blur
The poem turns when the speaker’s annoyance boils over: Enough of such mishaps
, he says, claiming they’d test the patience of an ox
. What follows is not a fix, but a surrender that sounds like freedom. He will forget both pairs
and spend his declining years
happily saluting strange women and grandfather clocks
. The tone shifts here from anxious competence—trying to manage the glasses, trying not to err—to a breezy, almost defiant acceptance of error. In a strange way, the speaker chooses misrecognition as a lifestyle: if life is going to blur, he’ll stop fighting and make the blur into a joke he controls.
The joke’s sharper edge
That final preference isn’t only comic; it’s a small act of self-protection. If you can’t reliably tell a person from a clock, you can either feel diminished or you can treat every greeting as generous, even when misdirected. Still, the last line keeps a sting inside the grin: calling them declining years
admits the cost. The poem ends with the speaker performing cheerfulness, but the performance is also a cover for the fear that, sooner or later, the world’s faces and meanings will keep slipping just out of focus.
Feel free to be first to leave comment.