The Dance Of Death - Analysis
To Ernest Christophe
A coquette made of bone
The poem’s central move is to dress Death up as a flirt and then insist, coldly and gleefully, that this is not a costume at all. Baudelaire opens with almost ballroom admiration: Death arrives with her big bouquet
, handkerchief and gloves
, carrying herself with the easy manner
of a slender coquette
. The shock isn’t only that she’s a skeleton; it’s that she behaves like someone practiced in social pleasure. By giving Death a “manner,” the poem makes mortality not a distant event but a present participant in our entertainments—someone who can keep time to the music.
The tone here is deliberately seductive: a “slim waist at a ball,” slippers with pompons pretty as flowers
, a queenly fullness
of dress. That lavishness is what the poem will later condemn. Even at the start, the elegance feels slightly forced, like glamour stretched over something too sharp.
Adornment as concealment (and as advertisement)
The details of clothing keep turning into acts of hiding. The frill or lace at her collarbones—likened to a lecherous brook
rubbing against the rocks
—modestly protects
her funereal charms
from cat-calls and jeers
. Modesty is funny here, because a skeleton has nothing left to be modest about; the “chaste” gesture becomes a parody of social etiquette. The poem suggests that culture itself—the whole apparatus of taste, fashion, flirtation—is a screen we raise against the fact of decay. But screens also draw attention. Dressing Death “well” doesn’t erase her; it turns her into the most fascinating person in the room.
Nullity with flowers: the poem’s first grim revelation
Then the poem bluntly removes the face. Her deep eye-sockets
are empty and dark
, and her skull is skillfully adorned with flowers
. That combination—void plus decoration—produces one of the poem’s sharpest contradictions: beauty depends on absence. The line Charm of a non-existent thing
makes Death into a kind of aesthetic object, “madly arrayed,” a nothingness dressed for a party. The horror is not only physical; it’s metaphysical. The poem keeps asking: if the “person” is ultimately a skull, what exactly are we admiring when we admire a body, a face, a lover?
The speaker’s scandalous taste
Baudelaire doesn’t pretend to be morally disgusted; he confesses a preference. He imagines lovers drunken with flesh
calling the skeleton a caricature
, then counters with the marvelous elegance of the human frame
: You satisfy my fondest taste, tall skeleton!
The speaker’s tone is both courtly and perverse—like someone praising a dancer’s posture while staring straight through the costume at the bones. That “taste” is a provocation: the poem implies that conventional desire is shallow because it refuses to look at what it rests on. To love the body while refusing its fate is, in this logic, a kind of ignorance.
Why is Death dancing: to mock, or to forget?
The poem’s hinge is the set of questions that follow the admiration. Does Death come to trouble the festival of Life
with her potent grimace
, or is she driven by some old desire
toward Pleasure’s sabbath
? The speaker imagines her listening to songs of violins
, moving among the flood of orgies
, trying to cool the hell
in her heart. Suddenly Death isn’t only a judge; she’s a participant in the same restless craving as the living. That’s the poem’s nastiest insight: it collapses the distance between the grave and the dance floor. Even Death, it suggests, has the habit of seeking distraction.
The serpent behind the ribs, and the strength to enjoy horror
When the speaker calls her an Inexhaustible well of folly and of sins
, the compliment becomes an indictment. Through the curved trellis of your ribs
he sees the insatiable asp
still wandering inside—a vivid emblem of appetite that outlives flesh. That image makes desire feel ancient, repetitive, almost mechanical: a serpent looping where organs used to be. And yet the speaker admits a limit: I fear your coquetry / Will not find a reward
, because The charms of horror enrapture only the strong!
Most people can’t tolerate the truth the skeleton embodies; they can’t look at the eternal smile
of your thirty-two teeth
without bitter nausea
. The tension is clear: the poem both celebrates a fearless gaze and recognizes how rare—and how isolating—that gaze is.
Perfume, makeup, and the lie of disgust
The poem then broadens from one dancer to everyone. Who has not clasped a skeleton
, who hasn’t fed upon what belongs to the grave
? This isn’t only about literal death; it’s about how desire already contains consumption, ending, and loss. Against that, the poem ridicules the clean, offended response: He who shows disgust believes that he is handsome.
Disgust becomes vanity pretending to be morality.
So Death, now named with brutal sexuality—Noseless dancer, irresistible whore
—is told to speak the truth social life avoids: despite the art of make-up / You all smell of death!
The bluntness of Skeletons perfumed with musk
is the poem’s satirical climax: our cosmetics are just scented denial applied to a body already headed toward preservation of another kind.
The global dance and the unseen trumpet
In the final sweep, the ballroom becomes the world. From the Seine’s cold quays to the Ganges’ burning shores
, humanity skips and swoons
and fails to notice the Angel’s trumpet
overhead, gaping ominously like a black blunderbuss
. That simile is startlingly violent: the instrument of judgment becomes a weapon, an almost comic, ugly gun pointed at the revelers. The ending seals the poem’s irony: In all climes
, Death admires you
, and frequently
she, too, is scenting herself with myrrh
, mingl[ing] her irony
with our insanity. Death doesn’t stand outside the party; she’s stylish enough to blend in. That is Baudelaire’s bleakest joke—and his most persuasive one.
A harder question the poem leaves hanging
If horror’s wine
is only for the strong
, what does the poem want strength to accomplish: clearer sight, or a more refined kind of pleasure? The speaker’s devotion to the tall skeleton
can read as courage, but it also risks becoming its own vanity—another pose at the ball, just darker, prouder, and more “honest” than the rest.
Feel free to be first to leave comment.