Gee I Like To Think Of Dead - Analysis
Death as a playmate, not a threat
The poem’s central move is to make death feel like intimacy—not an ending, but a kind of deeper nearness. Right away, the speaker says gee i like to think of dead
, a deliberately childish, offhand opening that refuses solemnity. Death is described as nearer because deeper
, and the poem keeps translating the abstract word dead into things you can touch, joke with, or even flirt with. The tone is bright, mischievous, and oddly trusting: death isn’t a judge or a void here, but a companion with a smile
, a voice, and opinions about dancing.
The round well: where lost things become a community
The poem’s strongest image is the well, with its little round water
and its “end” where everything dropped winds up. The speaker insists it’s too cool to be crooked
and too firm to be hard
, describing death as a paradox: steady without being cruel, sharp without being punitive. Then the well fills with a startling inventory—rosebugs
, jackknives
, kittens
, pennies
—things from different emotional worlds (tender, dangerous, alive, useless) thrown together. In death, they sit there looking at each other
and have the fastest time
because they’ve never met before
. That’s a strange consolation: death becomes a place where randomness turns into company, where the dropped and discarded finally belong somewhere.
Child-logic and slapstick: defanging the idea of dead
The speaker keeps using child-logic to make death seem not only safe but funny. dead's more even
than messy morning hair; it’s clever
like an alarm that goes POF
, a comic sound effect that turns danger into a toy. Even the image of the little striker
tickling everybody's brain
is both violent and playful: death gets inside your head, but the poem describes it as tickling, and the crowd’s response is absurdly gentle—people put out their finger
and stuff the striker all full of fingers
. The tension here is clear: the poem keeps brushing against threat (sharpness, striking, falling, the well) while stubbornly insisting on harmlessness. It’s as if the speaker is rehearsing a charm against fear: if you can keep the image silly, maybe it can’t hurt you.
Flirtation and consent: death as a social pleasure
As the poem goes on, death becomes not just a plaything but a social and erotic presence. Dead smiles like the nicest man you've never met
who winks
at you on a streetcar; the speaker pretends not to see, yet inwardly confesses My how glad he winked
. This is death as flirtation—an invitation that feels illicit, exciting, and chosen. Even gossip becomes sensual: if dead talks about you behind your back
, it makes your neck feel pleasant and stoopid
. That word stoopid
matters: it’s the poem admitting that part of the attraction is a willing loss of control, a surrender of cleverness into sensation.
Then the invitation becomes explicit. Dead asks may i have this one
—a dance-hall phrase—and even though you were never introduced
, you say Yes
because you know you want it. This is one of the poem’s key contradictions: death is framed as something you consent to, even desire, even though death is also what happens beyond consent in real life. The poem solves that contradiction by making desire the emotional truth: the speaker is trying to tell the truth about the pull of disappearing, of not having to hold yourself together anymore.
Largeness: the erotic relief of not being yourself
The poem’s emotional turning point is the long description of dead as nice like a dance
where you take all your prickly-clothes off
and squeeze-into-largeness
. The phrase without one word
is crucial: death offers silence, not explanation. In that largeness, you lie still as anything
, and then the largeness begins to give you,the dance all over again
. Death is imagined as a second, deeper version of pleasure—pleasure stripped of self-consciousness, clothes, and speech.
The poem goes further than comfort: it claims death lets you feel not only what you felt when men you liked touched you, but also what you made,men feel
when you touched them. In other words, death dissolves the boundary between self and other. The speaker’s desire isn’t just for rest; it’s for a kind of total empathy, an end to separateness. The tension sharpens here: this is beautiful, but it’s also frightening, because it suggests the self is something you can step out of—and might want to.
A sharper edge: loneliness, drift, and the small sorrow inside “dead”
Even in all this brightness, the poem lets sorrow in. Dead is sorry
like a thistlefluff-thing
drifting off to land on somebody's roof
, somewhere where who-ever-heard-of-growing
. That image isn’t communal like the well; it’s solitary and windblown. It acknowledges the part of death that is pure displacement: going where you can’t take root, where nobody expects anything from you anymore. The poem’s earlier excitement depends on the idea that death is a welcoming place; this thistlefluff moment admits that it can also be a place where you simply don’t belong anywhere.
The final invitation: choosing the well because you love what’s in it
The ending returns to the well, but now death speaks directly: come with me
, into the round well
, and see the kitten and the penny
and the jackknife
and the rosebug
. The speaker answers with startling cheer: Sure
—and then lists the reasons in the simplest terms: for i like kittens i do
and jackknives i do
and pennies i do
. It’s funny, but it’s also devastatingly honest. The speaker doesn’t claim philosophical courage; they claim affection. Death wins, in this poem, by presenting itself as the place where everything the speaker has ever liked ends up—where love’s scattered objects gather.
A hard question the poem keeps asking anyway
If death is nearer
and deeper
, and if it loves
, what does that say about the speaker’s life outside the well? The poem’s insistence that dead never says
Time for your musiclesson
hints that the living world feels full of demands, shame, and comparison—you know you never can
. In that light, the seduction of death isn’t just morbid; it’s a protest against a life that keeps telling you to perform.
Why the poem feels so persuasive
What makes the poem linger is the way its voice—lowercase, breathless, intimate—builds a private logic where death becomes the name for relief, permission, and closeness. Yet it never fully erases the darker truth it circles: everything in the poem reaches the well by falling. The speaker’s delight in the well’s treasures—kittens alongside jackknives—keeps that danger present even when the tone is giddy. In the end, the poem doesn’t argue that death is harmless; it reveals how powerfully a human mind can want it to be kind, even lovable, because the mind is tired of being braced against fear.
Feel free to be first to leave comment.