Sylvia Plath

Lyonnesse - Analysis

A drowned country addressed like a lost dog

The poem’s central claim feels blunt from its first line: there is no calling back what has been drowned by time, not with nostalgia, not with prayer, not with any human sound. No use whistling for Lyonnesse! starts almost comically—as if the speaker is scolding someone trying to summon an absent pet—but the joke turns grave as soon as the sea arrives. The repeated Sea-cold, sea-cold is both a physical fact and a verdict: the coldness is the climate of loss, and it doesn’t warm for anyone’s longing.

Lyonnesse, the legendary land swallowed by the sea, becomes in Plath’s hands a way to talk about how whole lives can disappear and yet remain oddly present, like a bruise under skin. The speaker doesn’t invite us to mourn politely; she insists on a harsher recognition: some places don’t merely vanish—they sink into a larger mind that can hold them without caring.

The “white, high berg” on a forehead

The poem’s most unsettling move is how it relocates the drowned world into a face. Take a look at the white, high berg on his forehead: Lyonnesse has not just sunk in the ocean; it has sunk into a being, a presence, a godlike He who carries the evidence of submersion as a mark. The line There’s where it sunk makes the myth almost anatomical. The lost land is not under waves so much as embedded in someone’s body—like a memory scar, except the body belongs to a power too vast to feel it as pain.

Even the colors refuse to settle. The sea is blue, green, / Gray, then indeterminate gilt, a phrase that flashes like tarnished gold. That indeterminate quality matters: Lyonnesse is not recoverable as a clear picture. The poem won’t let the reader reconstruct it neatly; it keeps sliding among hues, as if the very act of looking is disturbed by the water and by the scale of the thing looking back.

Eyes that “wash” and bells that “mouth”

The god-figure’s eyes are not windows of sympathy; they are tides. The Sea of his eyes is described washing over it, as though Lyonnesse is continually being re-submerged by the act of being seen. This is a cruelly elegant contradiction: usually to be seen is to be rescued from oblivion, but here the gaze is what keeps the place underwater. The eyes don’t illuminate; they inundate.

From that submerged world, the poem gives us one small, eerie sign of life: a round bubble Popping upward from the mouths of bells. Bells are supposed to ring—air, sound, community—but underwater they can only form bubbles. It’s a perfect image of muted ceremony: religion and village life reduced to trapped air, rising briefly, then gone. The phrase mouts of bells also makes the drowned town seem to be trying to speak and failing. The poem keeps tightening the same tension: there is evidence of presence, but no possible return.

Heaven, disappointingly familiar

Midway through, the poem pivots from the god’s face to the drowned people’s expectations. People and cows appear together—an almost comic pairing that yanks the myth down into daily life, insisting that catastrophe takes the ordinary with it. The Lyonians had assumed Heaven would be something else, yet what they find is not some transformed realm but the same faces, / The same places. That repetition—same, same—captures a specific disappointment: not the shock of punishment, but the anticlimax of continuity.

Plath makes their afterlife feel like a cold pastoral scene: clear, green air that is quite breathable, Cold grits underfoot, and spidery water-dazzle on field and street. These details are almost tender in their precision, but the tenderness is edged: this is a heaven that keeps the texture of earth while draining away its comfort. The atmosphere is breathable, yes—but it is also cold, granular, and glittering in a way that suggests surface, not warmth. Their error wasn’t believing in heaven; it was believing heaven would feel like meaning.

Forgotten by a “big God” who closes one eye

The poem’s bitterest revelation is not drowning but neglect. It never occurred to the Lyonians that they had been forgot. Their tragedy, in other words, includes a kind of innocence: they still imagine themselves within someone’s attention. Then comes the devastating portrait of divinity: the big God who had lazily closed one eye and let them slip Over the English cliff and under so much history! The exclamation point lands like outrage. History isn’t a noble archive here; it’s a weight of sediment, a pressure that buries the living as effectively as seawater.

This is where the poem’s tone hardens into accusation. The god is not actively cruel; he is casual. The word lazily is almost worse than wrath, because it makes the Lyonians’ loss incidental. And the phrase so much history turns time into a physical mass. The drowned land is not only under the sea; it is under narratives, wars, empires—whatever decides what gets remembered.

A smile, an animal turn, and the real blankness

Yet the poem refuses to let God remain merely absent-minded. They did not see him smile, the speaker says, and then: Turn, like an animal, In his cage of ether, his cage of stars. The cosmic imagery should enlarge him into majesty, but the word cage shrinks that majesty into confinement. God is huge, yes, but also trapped—pacing in an enclosure made of his own element. That animal simile is startling: it suggests instinct, boredom, appetite. Even the heavens become bars.

Then the poem drops a line that reframes everything said before: He’d had so many wars! It’s easy to read this as a sardonic excuse—God is busy, preoccupied with larger violences, and small drowned countries don’t register. But it can also sound like exhaustion: a being worn down by repetitive conflict. Either way, the final sentence clarifies the poem’s true terror: The white gape of his mind is the real Tabula Rasa. Not the sea, not the cliff, not even history—the ultimate eraser is a blankness at the center of power, an emptiness capable of swallowing whole civilizations without needing to hate them.

The hardest question the poem leaves us with

If Lyonnesse is lost because God closed one eye, what does it mean that he can also smile? The smile suggests awareness, even enjoyment, which makes the earlier laziness feel less like accident and more like choice. The poem makes you wonder whether being forgotten is sometimes not a failure of attention but a deliberate clearing—another way the world is wiped clean by a mind with a white gape.

default user
PoetryVerse just now

Feel free to be first to leave comment.

8/2200 - 0