Sestina Of The Tramp - Analysis
A cheerful creed with a hard edge
The poem’s central claim is that the tramp’s life of continual movement is not just a taste for variety but a way of staying alive in the face of death’s certainty. The speaker opens with a shrugging authority—Speakin’ in general
—as if he’s taken the measure of every road worth taking. Yet what sounds like travel advice quickly becomes a philosophy: if you cannot use one bed too long
, you keep going, not because you’re chasing pleasure, but because stopping feels like a kind of dying.
The tone is boisterous and companionable, full of slangy confidence and repeated oaths—Gawd
—but underneath the jauntiness there’s pressure, almost panic. This is a man convincing himself as much as he’s addressing anyone else.
Watching the world, while the world watches you
Early on, he asks, What do it matter where
you die, as long as you’ve the health to keep looking. The verb watch matters: he wants to be present for the different ways
things are done, for men an’ women lovin’
, for chance happenings that appear as they come along
. The tramp casts life as a moving show, and himself as a spectator who refuses assigned seating.
But there’s a tension baked into that stance: watching sounds passive, yet his life is full of labor and sudden departures. He wants to be free of commitments, yet he’s deeply committed to motion itself. Even when chances ain’t
there, he admits he’s pretendin’
they are good
—a small confession that his optimism is sometimes an act of will, not a natural mood.
The habit that keeps him from dying
The poem’s restlessness sharpens when he turns to money: In cash or credit
it’s no good
. The trouble isn’t poverty so much as what he calls the ’abit
—the practiced inability to settle. He imagines an impossible alternative life: living but one day long
, never prophesy
ing or fretting, just somehow drawing tucker
from the world. That fantasy reveals what torments him: to stay put would require a calm he doesn’t possess.
He does insist on work—For ’im that doth not work
—and he boasts, I’ve turned my ’and
to most things. Yet even here the poem contradicts itself in a revealing way. He believes a man must work or surely die
, but he also refuses to labour all
his life on one same shift
. Survival, for him, is not steady duty; it’s repeated reinvention, a series of escapes that still keeps him useful.
The real “mate”: leaving as a kind of love
The clearest turn comes when he describes the moment he can’t be held: something in my ’ead
upset it all
. Pay won’t hold him; logic won’t hold him; even his own claims about what’s good
won’t hold him for long. The scene at the dock—watching dock-lights die
—is quietly elegiac, a small death that mirrors the bigger one he keeps talking around. And then the poem offers its most intimate relationship: he meets my mate—the wind
that tramps the world.
Calling the wind his mate makes his wandering feel less like homelessness and more like devotion. But it’s also lonely: a human partner might ask him to stay; the wind never will. The poem’s bravado thins here, and you can feel why he keeps moving—because stillness would force him into the kind of closeness, and the kind of accounting, he dodges.
The world as a book you can’t bear to finish
When he says It’s like a book
, he gives the tramp’s compulsion its cleanest metaphor. He can read and care
for the world only just so long
before he feels he will die
unless he gets the page done
and turns another. The turn is exciting but also grim: the next page is likely not so good
, yet he turns anyway because what you’re after
is to turn ’em all
. That’s the poem’s deepest contradiction: he blesses the world because he enjoys it, yet he treats enjoyment as insufficient unless it can be multiplied without end.
A blessing that sounds like an epitaph
The final lines are both gratitude and self-defense. Gawd bless this world!
he says, then qualifies it—Excep’ when awful long
—as if long stays are the one thing he can’t forgive. And he ends by drafting his own tombstone: write, before I die
, ’E liked it all!
It’s a charming sentence, but it’s also suspiciously neat. Liking it all becomes the summary that excuses the unfinished jobs, the dropped lives, the friendships not kept.
In the end, the poem doesn’t simply praise freedom; it shows a man making freedom into necessity. The repeated nearness of die
gives his cheerfulness its urgency: he keeps turning pages not because the book is endless, but because he isn’t.
Feel free to be first to leave comment.