Tales Of A Wayside Inn Part 3 The Landlords Tale The Rhyme Of Sir Christopher - Analysis
A mock-hero lands in Boston
Longfellow’s central move is to treat Sir Christopher’s arrival like a pageant and then steadily deflate it, until the man looks less like a knight than a traveling costume. The opening claims he stepped upon this continent
as if his august presence
could bestow a glory to the colony
, and the poem keeps that inflated language in play so it can puncture it later. The tone is amused from the start: Sir Christopher is introduced as a celebrity imported from Merry England
, and the speaker invites us to gawp at him in the little Boston of Winthrop’s time
, where his courtly performance will inevitably look a little too shiny, a little too loud.
That comedy is sharpened by the obsessive inventory of his look: rapier dangling
, Prince Rupert hat
with ostrich plume
, gloves that exhaled a faint perfume
, luxuriant curls
, and superior manners now obsolete
. The last phrase is the poem’s verdict tucked into a flourish: what he represents is not just morally suspect, but socially out of season—an Old World style trying to hold power in a place that doesn’t quite accept its rules.
The “calm retreat” that is really a cover story
Sir Christopher tries to rebrand himself as a man seeking peace: his so-called country-seat
, his talk of being weary grown of the world
, his desire for a private life and a calm retreat
. But the poem immediately sets a key tension: he speaks the language of withdrawal while pursuing the pleasures of display. The line But a double life was the life he led
isn’t merely plot; it’s the poem’s moral spotlight. He profess[es]
a godly course
and hints he wants the Puritan church, yet spends his idle hours
with roystering Morton of Merry Mount
, a figure defined by misrule and riot and sin
and by the biblically loaded phrase looked on the wine when it was red
. The poem’s satire isn’t subtle: Sir Christopher’s religion and respectability are costumes too.
The flower-bed and the hidden woman
The cabin’s one touch of beauty—the modest flower-bed
of sweet alyssum and columbine
—works like a clue, because it suggests some other hand than his own
. Those flowers become the poem’s soft counterpoint to all the hard surfaces of rapier, hat, and law. They lead to the whispered discovery of a little lady with golden hair
, called a cousin but said to be wed in the Italian manner
. Longfellow lets the colony’s gossip do much of the work here: scandal grows from what’s known into what’s merely suspected, until the larger, more poisonous accusation arrives—he is a Papist in disguise
. The poem shows how quickly moral panic piles up: the community’s suspicion doesn’t stop at a secret marriage; it escalates into fear of Catholic infiltration, and then into near-farce when letters arrive from two other wives
, one begging for repentance, the other demanding his instant death
. The comic extremity of those letters also exposes a grim fact: his charm harms real people, and the damage travels across the ocean.
When the chase becomes slapstick—and then grim
The narrative turns into mock-heroic action when the governor sends a warrant signed and sealed
and the marshal rides out as if to storm some castle
and seize a robber-baron
. But the “castle” is only a log cabin, and the heroic raid nets not the knight but the woman, caught gathering the same flowers in bright sunshine
. The image of her carried off in triumph
while her tears fall onto sweet alyssum and columbine
is one of the poem’s sharpest moral contrasts: the colony’s justice can be righteous and ridiculous at once, powerful enough to punish, not always precise enough to punish the right person. The governor’s little homily
about women half cousins and half wives
lands as both moral lecture and failure—his words availed
nothing—so authority resorts to removal: she is shipped away to the other two wives
, as if exile could untie the knot.
The knight’s glamour collapses into feathers
Sir Christopher’s own capture is staged through another uncomfortable contradiction: his refuge among the noble savage
begins as comedy (the man delights in the feathered hat
and velvet vest
) and shifts into menace when the bounty makes him want to bring in a beautiful scalp
. The poem uses this episode to show how Sir Christopher’s life is governed by appetites—his and other people’s—and how quickly admiration turns predatory when money enters. Back in town, the final deflation is visual: hat deformed
, plumage broken
, doublet rent
, boots with dust and mire
, yet unblushing
, still playing the part. He tries to modify and extenuate
with the same courtly patter, claiming colonial laws are too harsh for a gallant cavalier
who moves in a higher sphere
. But now the spell is gone: his words weigh no more than feathers flying in the breeze
. The governor’s refusal to answer—he deigned…never a word
—is the poem’s final power play: silence, not argument, strips the knight of the stage.
Apples of Sodom, ropes of sand: what he “furnished” the land with
The closing couplet is a moral signature: Sir Christopher is the first
to furnish the land with apples of Sodom and ropes of sand
—things that look nourishing or strong but turn to ash and collapse in the hand. That ending makes the poem’s judgment larger than one scandalous man. He embodies a whole set of imported illusions: aristocratic polish without responsibility, religion as disguise, romance as damage, and status as something performed until it can’t be. Yet the poem also leaves a thorny aftertaste: the colony that expels him does so with a brisk certainty that can look like justice—and can also look like a community eager to cleanse itself by throwing the mess back across the sea.
Feel free to be first to leave comment.