Tales Of A Wayside Inn Part 1 The Musicians Tale The Saga Of King Olaf Xiii The Building Of The Long Serpent - Analysis
A boast that turns into a prophecy
This episode reads like a celebration of workmanship that also admits how close craftsmanship can come to sabotage. Thorberg Skafting begins in a mood of easy swagger, whistling
that the task would bewilder
anyone but himself. That early brag isn’t just vanity; by the end, the poem makes it true in the only way sagas can: people really do hear of Thorberg Skafting / For a hundred year
. The poem’s central claim is that lasting fame is not earned by smooth progress, but by a maker’s willingness to undo his own work—violently, deliberately—so it can be remade as legend.
The shipyard as a musician’s dream
Longfellow turns labor into sound. The shop floor is a kind of orchestra: hewed and hammered
, laughed and sang
, wheels that spun the shining flax
. Thorberg hears the uproar as music to his ear
, and the word Fancy
whispers faster as the noise rises. The tone here is bright and kinetic, almost intoxicated with motion; the poem wants us to feel how a master-builder can sit with half-closed eyes
and still “see” a larger ship—Twice the Dragon's size
—as if he’s composing it. Even the ambition is musical: repetition (“twice”) becomes a kind of refrain driving the work forward.
Smoke, tar, and the fear of a curse
Then the poem darkens its palette. The forge is compared to a warlock's midnight orgies
, and the tar-kettle smoked and bubbled
like a cauldron. This isn’t just color; it introduces suspicion that building can be contaminated—by “mischief,” by envy, by something like sorcery. The poem even asks outright whether any curse
is being mixed in. That question creates a key tension: is mastery a clean, rational skill, or is it closer to dark art, where transformation requires heat, danger, and a willingness to ruin what was whole? The shipyard’s “music” now borders on a spell.
The real “ill wind” comes from home
The supernatural talk is undercut by something plainer: an ill wind
wafts words of woe
from Thorberg’s homestead. He leaves for his farm, returning only by night
, and the tone shifts from expansive confidence to hungry anxiety—longing, yearning
—as he rushes back and won’t leave until morning. Whatever happened at home, it introduces the possibility that this builder’s private life can interrupt the public monument he’s making. The repeated instruction to the workers—Build ye thus and so
—sounds less like calm leadership now than a man trying to keep control at a distance while something elsewhere threatens his authority.
The gashes: destruction as design
The hinge of the tale is the discovery that someone has cut deep gashes
down the ship’s sides so that Not a plank was spared
. King Olaf’s response is immediate saga-justice—Death be to the evil-doer
—and the poem lets anger flare as Olaf’s face turns redder / Than his scarlet cloak
. Then comes the startling reversal: Thorberg answers, smiling
, that he did it himself. The smile matters. It makes the act feel less like a crime and more like a calculated lesson in appearances: what looks like vandalism is actually refinement. When Thorberg chipped and smoothed
the damaged planks, the King declares the ship Handsomer
than before. The contradiction is sharp: the builder earns praise by committing the very act that should destroy him. In this logic, the “curse” was never in the tar; it was in the risk that the ship might be merely adequate unless it passed through ruin.
Making a monster worth naming
The closing stanzas restore public triumph, but now it’s charged by what we’ve seen. The measurements—Seventy ells and four
—and the figure-head ferocious
with its crest of steel
turn the ship into a living beast, worthy of being christened The Long Serpent
. The cheers don’t only honor King Olaf’s command; they ratify Thorberg’s strange method. What lasts in the listeners’ memory is not just a flawless launch, but the story of a man who dared to carve his own masterpiece open and then heal it into something finer. The poem ends where it began—with the promise of a hundred year
—but now that promise feels earned by the tale’s hard truth: sometimes the master proves himself by being the “evil-doer” in order to become the savior of the work.
Feel free to be first to leave comment.