And Ill Kiss Thee Yet Yet - Analysis
written in 1788
A love song that tries to make one moment last forever
Burns’s central move in And I’ll Kiss Thee Yet, Yet is to take something fleeting and bodily—kissing—and insist it can carry the weight of permanence. The speaker repeats I’ll kiss thee yet, yet
like a promise he can keep simply by saying it again. What begins as giddy insistence becomes a kind of argument: if he can return to the kiss, he can return to happiness; if he can return often enough, he can make love feel unbreakable.
The poem’s tone is exuberant and intimate, with a warm teasing confidence. The refrain keeps coming back with the same affectionate address—My bony Peggy Alison
—as though the speaker can’t help circling the same thought: she is beautiful, and he wants her close, again and again.
The kiss as a shield against Care and Fear
The first bracketed stanza makes the kiss more than romance; it becomes protection. When she is near, Care and Fear
are not merely forgotten but actively challenged: I ever mair defy them
. The diction here is almost martial—defiance—yet it’s fueled by tenderness. He doesn’t claim the world becomes safe; he claims he becomes braver in her presence.
That defiance sharpens into comparison and a small social reversal: Young kings
on a hansel throne
are no sae blest
as he is. The speaker measures happiness against power and finds power wanting. It’s a playful boast, but it also reveals what the speaker values: not status, not spectacle, but the simple, repeatable fact of closeness.
Arms, treasure, and the almost-dangerous idea of enough
In the second stanza the lover’s body becomes a container for riches: When in my arms
he clasp
s his countless treasure
. The word countless is telling; he’s describing a person as immeasurable wealth, which flatters Peggy while also admitting his own appetite—he wants more than he can count, and he wants it held.
Then the poem makes its most startling claim of sufficiency: I seek nae mair o’ Heav’n
than sic a moment’s pleasure
. The tone stays bright, but the thought edges toward blasphemy or, at least, daring. Heaven is reduced to a “moment,” and the moment is made holy by desire. This is where the poem’s sweetness carries a risk: if one moment is enough, what happens when the moment ends?
The blue eyes that trigger eternity
The third stanza tries to answer that risk by pivoting from moment to forever. The speaker swears by thy een
—her eyes, sae bony blue
—as though their beauty is a sacred witness. The oath is immediate and physical: on thy lips
he seal
s his vow. The same mouth that receives kisses becomes the place where a lifelong promise is stamped.
Here the tone shifts from playful repetition to earnest solemnity. The speaker isn’t only celebrating pleasure; he is trying to lock it in time: I’m thine forever
, break it shall I never
. The poem’s emotional arc moves from again to always.
The poem’s key tension: repetition versus permanence
What the poem can’t fully resolve is the contradiction between its two kinds of devotion. On one hand, the refrain keeps love in the present tense—I’ll kiss thee
, over and over—suggesting affection is proven by repeated acts. On the other hand, the vow language wants a single decisive guarantee—thine forever
—as if love could be secured once and for all.
The brilliance is that Burns lets both impulses stand. The speaker’s promise of forever is made persuasive by the poem’s insistence on again. The repeated kiss becomes the practical version of eternity: not an abstract heaven, but a recurring, chosen return to the beloved.
A sharp question the poem quietly raises
If sic a moment’s pleasure
is all the heaven he wants, is the speaker elevating love—or shrinking the world to fit his desire? The poem sounds confident, but its intensity hints at need: he must keep kissing yet, yet
because the moment is precious precisely because it passes.
Feel free to be first to leave comment.